Assessing the feasibility of Nipah vaccine effliciency trials based on previous outbreaks in Bangladesh

Revision as of 01:59, 7 February 2026 by Nhmkerala (talk | contribs) (Created paper page - 2026-02-07T07:28:59.859521)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Authors: Birgit Nikolay, Gabriel Ribeiro dos Santos, Marc Lipsitch, Mahmudur Rahman, Stephen P. Luby, Henrik Salje, Emily S. Gurley, Simon Cauchemez

Year: 2021

Journal: Vaccine

DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2021.08.027

Summary

This paper investigates the feasibility of conducting a phase III Nipah vaccine trial in Bangladesh using simulations based on previous outbreaks.

Key Findings

  • Three vaccination study designs were compared: clustered randomized controlled trials (cRCT), stepped wedge trials (SWT) and randomized crossover trials (RxO).
  • The cRCT design requires the largest sample size but offers the highest statistical power.
  • The SWT and RxO designs have lower sample sizes but take longer to complete.

Methodology

  • Study Type: Simulation Study
  • Sample Size: Not specified, depends on the study design
  • Geographic Focus: Bangladesh
  • Time Period: Previously observed NiV cases

Topics

Epidemiology, Clinical, Virology

Relevance

This paper addresses the feasibility of evaluating Nipah vaccine efficacy trials in a context where spillovers from the zoonotic reservoir are infrequent.

Source

View the entire paper: File:Manuscript from vacc.pdf